Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16169 (PNJ)

RAJ RANI v. PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK AND OTHERS

RSA/291/2024 · 2025-01-22

Nidhi Gupta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN TH 129 (3 cases) 1. Raj Rani Punjab Na 2. Raj Rani The Chief 3. Raj Rani Shelly Mad CORAM: Present:- RSA Nos.291, 679 and 720 of 2024 ( IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR cases) RSA No.291 of 2 Date of decision Rani Versus ab National Bank and others RSA No.679 of 2 Rani Versus Chief Manager, Punjab National Ba RSA No.720 of 2 Rani Versus Madaan and others AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NI Mr. Manuj Nagrath, Advocate for the appellants. Mr. Gaurav Goel, Advocate for respondents No.1 to 4 in al Mr. N.K. Manchanda, Advoca 24 (O & M) 1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH 1 of 2024 (O & M) cision :-22.01.2025 …..Appellant …..Respondents 9 of 2024 (O & M) …..Appellant nal Bank and others …..Respondents 0 of 2024 (O & M) …..Appellant …..Respondents E NIDHI GUPTA vocate 4 in all cases. dvocate VIJAY ASIJA 2025.01.24 09.29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document NIDHI GU same judgm same are b same are be appellant/p passed by L judgment a (Senior D appellant/p appellant is in the lock alongwith a Malhotra w mandatory dismissed. submits tha and he has learned co present app RSA Nos.291, 679 and 720 of 2024 ( for respondents No.5 and 6 (in for respondents No.4 and 5 (in and for respondents No.1 and HI GUPTA J. (Oral) Since the present three appe judgments and decrees passed by the are being taken up altogether and v are being disposed of. The present appeals are llant/plaintiff against the judgment an ed by Learned Additional District Judg ment and decree 23.12.2021 passed ior Division), Ferozepur whereby llant/plaintiff for declaration to the llant is solely entitled to inherit the Es e locker and also entitled to receiv with accrued interest of deceased Vib otra widow of Darshan Lal (daughte atory injunction as per the relief cla issed. At the very outset, learned c its that the matter has been amicably e has instructions to withdraw the pre ed counsel for the appellant(s) pra nt appeals. Permitted to do so. Dismissed as withdrawn. 24 (O & M) 2 d 6 (in RSA-291-2024) d 5 (in RSA-679-2024) 1 and 2 (in RSA-720-2024). appeals are arising out of the by the learned Courts below, the and vide this common order the being preferred by the ent and decree dated 12.10.2023 ct Judge, Ferozepur upholding the ssed by the learned Civil Judge ereby the suit filed by the to the effect that the plaintiff/ the Estate including articles lying receive the debts and securities ed Vibha Malhotra @ Vibha Sikri aughter in law of appellant) and lief claimed in the suit has been rned counsel for the appellant(s) icably settled between the parties the present appeals. Accordingly, s) prays for withdrawal of the VIJAY ASIJA 2025.01.24 09.29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document connected m January 2 Vijay Asija Whether spea Whether Repo RSA Nos.291, 679 and 720 of 2024 ( Pending application(s), if any, Photocopy of this order be ected matter(s). 22, 2025 r speaking/reasoned Yes / No r Reportable Yes / No 24 (O & M) 3 if any, shall stands disposed of. er be placed in the file(s) of ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2025.01.24 09.29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document