Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 161676 (ALL)

M/S SWASTIK ENTERPRISES THRU.PROPRIETOR RAJESH KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. PUBLIC WORKS DEPTT. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/8575/2025 · 2025-09-03

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 8575 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. Heard learned counsel for the parties. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner, challenging the orders whereby the effort of reconciliation with regard to the claim payment was rejected on 26.07.2025. Considering the fact that an arbitration clause is contained in the agreement in between the parties, the petitioner can can apply for appointment of an arbitrator, if so advised, in accordance with law. The petition stands disposed of. September 3, 2025 Anurag Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mahesh Chandra Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) M/S Swastik Enterprises Thru.Proprietor Rajesh Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Public Works Deptt. Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench