SMT. KAMLA DEVI AND ANOTHER v. CONSOLIDATION OFFICER, KADIPUR, SULTANPUR AND OTHERS
WRIB/853/2025 · 2025-09-10
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 161672 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 161672 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - B No. - 853 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and Shri Yogesh Kumar Awasthi, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent no.1.
2. In light of the proposed order, notice to private respondents is dispensed with.
3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioners praying for direction to the respondent No.1 / Consolidation Officer, Kadipur, District Sultanpur, to decide the Case No.12 of 2025 "Kamla Devi and others vs. Ramesh Kumar Pal and others, under Section 12 U.P.C.H. Act, expeditiously.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that grievance of the petitioners would be sufficiently met in case respondent no.1 / Consolidation Officer, Kadipur, District Sultanpur considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner.
5. At this stage, this Court is not inclined to interfere in the matter under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. However, liberty is granted to the petitioners to approach the court/ authority concerned and move an appropriate application detailing urgency for expeditious disposal of the Case No.12 of 2025 "Kamla Devi and others vs. Ramesh Kumar Pal and others, under Section 12 U.P.C.H. Act, along with the order passed by this Court, within two weeks from today, and in case, if such an application is moved, the court/authority shall consider and decide the same within Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Virendra Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Smt. Kamla Devi And Another .....Petitioner(s) Consolidation Officer, Kadipur, Sultanpur And Others .....Respondent(s)
three weeks thereafter, and in case, any case for urgency is made out by the petitioners, it shall be pass appropriate orders thereupon, and proceed in accordance with law.
6. It is made clear that this Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merit and the court /authority concerned shall decide the matter strictly in accordance with law.
7. With the above observations, the writ petition is disposed of. September 10, 2025 KR WRIB No. 853 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RABINDRA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench