Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010211452025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] WEDNESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1109/2025 Between:
1. D. MADHAVI, W/O VISHNUVARDHAN REDDY, AGED 45 YEARS, HINDU, RESIDING AT D.NO.M.I.G.301-169, OPP SIRI NOBLE HOSPITAL, SUNKESULA ROAD, KURNOOL TOWN, KURNOOL DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. V TIRUMALA REDDY, S/O. CHALAPATHI REDDY, AGED 60 YEARS, RESIDING AT 9-113, MOTUKUPALLI VILLAGE AND POST, KADIRI MANDAL, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. INENI VENKATA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent:
1. S KRISHNA REDDY The Court made the following:
ORAL ORDER:
Heard Sri I. Venkata Prasad, learned Counsel for Civil Revision Petitioner and Sri S. Krishna Reddy, learned Counsel for the sole Respondent.
2. The Petitioner herein is the defendant in the Money Suit bearing O.S.No.9 of 2020 on the file of the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Kadiri. He has filed I.A.No.51 of 2025 to place on record Exs.B.1 to B.8. Vide Order dated 10.02.2025, the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Kadiri has partly allowed this application by admitting Document Nos.1 to 7.
3. The eighth document, which is styled as a “Memorandum of Understanding” dated 02.11.2020, was rejected by the learned Judge on the ground that the said document was executed after the filing of the Suit.
4. This Court has considered the contents of the said document, which has been placed on record. The said document appears to have been executed between the defendant/Petitioner herein and third parties on 02.11.2020, which is admittedly after the filing of the suit.
5. In this view of the matter, this Court is of the opinion that the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Kadiri has rightly declined to receive the said document. Hence, there is no merit in the present Civil Revision Petition.
6. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. No order as to costs.
7. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order.
______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 03.09.2025 DSV
203
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1109/2025
03.09.2025
DSV
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATHI MAIN CASE No. CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1109/2025 PROCEEDING SHEET
Sl. No
DATE ORDER Office Note
08.
03.09.2025 GRKP, J
Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. (vide separate order)
___________
GRKP, J DSV