Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 161666 (ALL)

SULAKSHANA TONDON v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

CRLP/8196/2025 · 2025-09-04

Rajeev Singh, Rajnish Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 8196 of 2025 Court No. - 10 HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J. HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J. 1. Heard Sri Arvind Tripathi, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed with the following prayer :- (i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties No 2 and 3 and 4 to take immediate steps/inaction against the alleged the persons, and complete the investigation of crime no 0031/2025, under section 115(2) B.N.S. in Police station Manaknagar, District Lucknow. 3. The learned A.G.A. has produced before this Court the instructions dated 31.08.2025, sent by Hariram, Sub-Inspector, Police Station Manaknagar, District Lucknow, which are taken on record. He, on the basis of said instructions submits that the charge sheet dated 22.08.2025, under Sections 115(2), 131, 351(3) and 352 B.N.S. has been prepared in the matter. 4. In view of the above, the writ his petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. September 4, 2025 A.Dewal Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Arvind Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Rajeev Singh,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Sulakshana Tondon .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ASHISH DEWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench