HARIRAM v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF REVENUE AND 5 OTHERS
WPIL/904/2025 · 2025-09-04
Pankaj Bhatia
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 161654 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 161654 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 904 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel.
2. The present petition has been filed with the following relief:
"(i) To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite parties particularly the opposite party No.1 to 5 to take necessary action against the private respondent for encroachment over the land gata No.357/0.0470 hect. and Gata No.354 area 0.0380 hect situated at Village Patna Haribansh, Bijhoori, Bijhuri, Tehsil Jaisinghpur, District- Sultanpur recorded as Banjar and Government/Gaon Sabha land in the revenue record and restore the nature of the aforesaid land to its original form."
3. Learned Standing Counsel informed that the proceedings under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 have already been initiated and are pending.
4. In view thereof, the present petition is disposed of with direction to conclude the proceedings expeditiously within the time prescribed under the statute, i.e., 90 days. September 4, 2025 Ashutosh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ramchandra Gupta, Ram Suphal, Sonali Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Hariram .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench