2025:HHC:29293 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CMPMO No. 448 of 2022 Decided on: 29.08.2025 Rama Devi … Petitioner Versus Rajinder Singh and another … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 ___________________________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Mr. Y.P. Sood, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Dinesh Thakur, Advocate. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) When this case was taken up for consideration, learned Counsel for the petitioner informs the Court that during the pendency of this petition, the respondents have achieved their motive of carrying out unauthorized and illegal construction and on account of this development, these proceedings have become infructuous but it be observed that whatever construction has been carried out by the respondents, the same shall abide by the final outcome of the civil suit and the respondents shall not claim any equity. Accordingly, these proceedings are closed with the observation that whatever construction has been carried out by the respondents during the pendency of the civil suit or may be carried 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2025:HHC:29293 out by them, shall abide by the final outcome of the civil suit and they shall not claim any equity. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge August 29, 2025 (narender)