RAM ACHAL v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF REVENUE, LKO. AND OTHERS
/8412/2025 · 2025-09-12
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 161626 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 161626 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 8412 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
1. Heard Sri Bipin Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel for petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel on behalf of State-respondent Nos. 1 to 3.
2. In light of the proposed order, notices to private respondents are dispensed with.
3. The petitioner by means of the present writ petition has challenged the legality and validity of the order dated 24.06.2024 passed by Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil- Milkipur, District - Ayodhya in proceedings U/S 176 of U.P.Z.A. & L.R. Act as well as appellate order dated 14.07.2025 passed by Additional Commissioner (Administration), Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya.
4. A preliminary objection has been made by learned Standing Counsel that the petitioner has an efficacious remedy of filing a second appeal before the Board of Revenue.
5. At this stage, learned counsel for petitioner does not dispute the aforesaid submissions and prays that present writ petition may be dismissed with a liberty to the petitioner to file a second appeal before Board of Revenue.
6. In light of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed with the aforesaid liberty. September 12, 2025 Ravi/ Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Bipin Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh (Alok Mathur,J.) Ram Achal .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue, Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench