Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 161624 (ALL)

SHUBASH CHANDRA SRIVASTAVA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. MEDICAL AND HEALTH U.P. LKO. AND ANOTHER

WRIA/7265/2023 · 2025-09-03

Manish Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 7265 of 2023 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite parties. 2. Petition has been filed seeking a direction to opposite parties to declare result of petitioner pertaining to examination conducted for 53 vacancies of Dark Room Assistant in terms of Advertisement dated 07.09.2001, prior to conduct of examine under fresh Advertisement dated 15.10.2012 for 355 vacancies of Dark Room Assistant. 3. The prayer so made is clearly in the nature of mandamus but learned counsel for petitioner has not been able to indicate any statutory liability cast upon opposite parties for declaring the result of the examination which was conducted in the year 2001. 4. It is trite that a writ in the nature of Mandamus can be issued only for the purposes of enforcement of statutory Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Raj Karan Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Shubash Chandra Srivastava .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Medical And Health U.P. Lko. And Another .....Respondent(s) duties and liabilities and not for assuaging hurt sensibilities of petitioner. 5. In view of aforesaid factors, this Court does not find any occasion to grant indulgence. Petition therefore being devoid of merits is dismissed. Parties to bear their own costs. September 3, 2025 Subodh/- WRIA No. 7265 of 2023 2 (Manish Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- SUBODH KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench