Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010156772025
2025:GAU-AS:9292
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/757/2025 RAHMAN TARIQUE MASHUD AND ORS S/O LATE MOTIUR RAHMAN, RESIDENT OF HOUSE NO. 115/A, KUMARPARA PANCHALI, PO AND PS BHARALUMUKH, GUWAHATI, DIST KAMRUP M ASSAM 781001 2: SAYERA RAHMAN W/O LATE MOTIUR RAHMAN
RESIDENT OF HOUSE NO. 115/A KUMARPARA PANCHALI PO AND PS BHARALUMUKH GUWAHATI DIST KAMRUP M ASSAM 781001 3: MASUMA RAHMAN D/O LATE MOTIUR RAHMAN
RESIDENT OF HOUSE NO. 115/A KUMARPARA PANCHALI PO AND PS BHARALUMUKH GUWAHATI DIST KAMRUP M ASSAM 78100 VERSUS ARJOO AHMED W/O RAHMAN TARIQUE MASHUD, D/O KHANSUR ALI, RESIDENT OF HOUSE NO. 116, NIJORAPAR, NOONMATI, PS NOONMATI, DIST KAMRUP M ASSAM 781020 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. H BURAGOHAIN, MR. S BISWAS,MS D DEVI,MR. B J MUKHERJEE
Page No.# 2/3 Advocate for the Respondent : MR R SHARMA,
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA
ORDER Date : 19.07.2025
1. Heard Mr. H. Buragohain, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. Iranglube, learned counsel for the respondent.
2. This application has been filed praying for correction of the order dated 04.04.2025, passed by this Court in Criminal Petition No.281/2025.
3. On that day, the petitioners, Sayera Rahman and Masuma Rahman were given the protection not to be compelled to appear before the Trial Court but because of typographical error, the name of Sayera Rahman was not mentioned in the said
order, in her place, the name of Rahman Tarique Mashud was erroneously shown.
4. Therefore, the order stands corrected.
5. It is hereby directed that the petitioners, Sayera Rahman and Masuma Rahman only shall not be compelled to appear before the Trial Court until further
order. The name of Rahman Tarique Mashud stands deleted from the order dated 04.04.2025, passed by this Court in Criminal Petition No.281/2025.
Page No.# 3/3
6. This order shall form a part of the order dated 04.04.2025, passed in Criminal Petition No.281/2025.
7. With the aforesaid direction, the I.A. stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant