Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16160 (ALL)

AJAY @ BHAIYAN SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

NA528/4126/2025 · 2025-02-18

Sanjay Kumar Pachori

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:25697 Court No. - 75 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 4126 of 2025 Applicant :- Ajay @ Bhaiyan Singh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Krishna Mani Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J. Heard Sri Krishna Mani, learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State. The present application under Section 528 of BNSS has been filed to quash the order dated 24.02.2020 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mirzapur, in Criminal Case No. 6403 of 2017 (State v. Rajaram and Others), under Sections 504 and 506, whereby the non-bailable warrants has been issued. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the impugned order has been passed by the court without satisfying itself that the summon and other process for attendance has been served and without issuing any summon or bailable warrant, direct N.B.W. has been issued. It is further submitted that applicant was on bail at the time of issuing non-bailable warrant. Learned counsel for the applicant further submitted that the impugned order has been passed without considering the facts and circumstances of the case and law provided in this regard. It is further submitted that order of the non-bailable warrant has been passed on 24.02.2020 without satisfying the service of summons or bailable warrants itself and reason to believe from absconding the process of the court. Learned A.G.A. as well as learned counsel for the opposite party No. 2 have opposed the application. Considering submissions of learned counsel and perusing record, the instant application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. is finally disposed of with a direction that in case applicant appears before the court below within four weeks from today and applies for bail/recall of non bailable warrant, his application shall be decided in the light of the observations made in the judgments rendered by the Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation & Another, (2021) 10 SCC 773, Siddharth Vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh & Another 2022 (11) SCC 676 and Aman Preet Singh Vs. C.B.I. through Director 2021 SCC Online SC 941. For a period of four weeks from today or till applicant appears before the court below, whichever is earlier, execution of non bailable warrant against the applicant shall be kept in abeyance. Order Date :- 19.2.2025 Akram Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD AKRAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad