Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 161597 (ALL)

MUSKAN CHAUHAN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. OF HOME LKO AND 3 OTHERS

CRLP/8430/2025 · 2025-09-17

Rajeev Singh, Rajnish Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 8430 of 2025 Court No. - 10 HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J. HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A. for the State. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner for the following prayers :- (i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorary or likewise to the opposite party no.2, to instruct the opposite party no.4 to register the petitioner's application given to S.H.O. Krishna Nagar, into F.I.R. (ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus or likewise commanding the opposite party no.2 to take necessary and appropriate decision. Learned A.G.A. raises an objection that the writ petition has been rendered infructuous, as the F.I.R. has already been lodged. In view of the above, learned counsel for the petitioner states that he does not want to press the writ petition and prays that the same may be dismissal as withdrawn. Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. September 17, 2025 A.Dewal Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shyam Bahadur Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Rajeev Singh,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Muskan Chauhan .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Of Home Lko And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ASHISH DEWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench