RAJVEER SINGH v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND THROUGH SECRETARY, EDUCATION UTTARAKHAND GOVERNMENT
WPSS/3051/2018 · 2025-11-17
Rakesh Thapliyal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16158 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16158 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:UHC:10169
SL. No. Dat e Office Not es, r epor t s, or der s or pr oceedin gs or dir ect ion s an d Regist r ar ’s or der w it h Sign at u r es COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
W PSS/ 3 0 5 1 / 2 0 1 8 Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J.
1. Mr. M.K. Ray, learned counsel for the petitioner.
2. Mr. Pradeep Hairiya and Mr. D.S. Bohra, learned Standing Counsel for the State / respondents.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the relief, as sought in the instant writ petition, in fact, has been redressed, except four months’ salary.
4. Learned State Counsel have also submit that in fact, the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed.
5. In view of the submissions, as advanced by
learned counsel for the parties, writ petition is dismissed as infructuous, however, with regard to payment of arrears of salary, petitioner may move a representation before the authorities concerned within two weeks and the authorities shall decide the same within one month thereafter.
(Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 17.11.2025 SKS