Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16158 (AP)

A.Koteswara Rao v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/9220/2019 · 2025-09-21

B V L N Chakravarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010211332019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] MONDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 9220/2019 Between: 1. A.KOTESWARA RAO, S/O. NAGESWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, OCC RTA AGENT , RIO. SRINIVAS NAGAR, VINUKONDA ROAD, NARASARAOPET, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE RURAL, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NARASARAOPET II TOWN P.S., GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, NARASARAOPET II TOWN POLICE STATION, NARASARAOPET, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ or order or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the 2 action of the respondent Nos. 3 and 4 in opening the suspect sheet on the file of the II Town Police Station, Narasarapet, Guntur district against the petitioner as there are no cases pending is being illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional of India and violation of Article 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to close the suspect sheet against the petitioner by considering the petitioner last representation dated 14-8-2018 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents No. 3 & 4 not to call the petitioner to the police satiation or in any manner interfere with petitioner personal life and liberty pending disposal of the Writ Petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. VENKATESWERLLU KESAMSETTY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO:9220 of 2019 The Court made the following Order: This Court after perusing the earlier proceedings gave a direction on 22.09.2025, to list the matter under the caption ‘For Dismissal’. However, today also, there is no representation for the petitioner. 2. Learned Additional Government Pleader representing the State is in attendance. 3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. No order as to costs. Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI Dated: 22.09.2025 PSA 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 9220 of 2019 Date: 22.09.2025 PSA