Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 161577 (ALL)

SHWETA SRIVASTAVA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

A483/716/2025 · 2025-09-02

Shree Prakash Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 483 No. - 716 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. The instant application under section 483 Cr.P.C. has been filed with the prayer to direct the learned Special Chief Judicial Magistrate, C.B.I. (A.P.), Lucknow to decide Criminal Case No.4432/2024 (State Vs. Sarita Kaushal and others), arising out of charge-sheet no.1/2023 dated 17.11.2023 filed in Case Crime No.0128/2023, lodged at Police Station Mahanagar, District Lucknow within the stipulated period of time. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the applicant submits that the FIR of the aforesaid criminal case was lodged by the applicant on 10.06.2023 and after investigation the investigating officer had filed charge-sheet on 17.11.2023 and the learned trial Court took cognizance of the offence on 12.01.2024 and summoned the private opposite parties. He further submits that since the opposite party nos. 2 and 3 were not appearing before the Court, non- bailable warrants were issued against them. 4. After arguing at length, learned counsel appearing for the applicant submits that interest of justice would be sub-served if this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to direct the trial court to decide the matter within the stipulated period of time, as may be fixed by this court. 5. Learned A.G.A. appearing for the State has no objection. 6. Considering aforesaid innocuous prayer, the trial court is directed to consider and decide Criminal Case No.4432/2024 (State Vs. Sarita Kaushal Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Surendra Kumar Mishra, Sheo Bahadur Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Shweta Srivastava .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) and others) with expedition, in accordance with law, considering the instructions and guidelines issued by this court time to time. 7. With the aforesaid observation, the instant application stands disposed of. . (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) September 2, 2025 MVS/- A483 No. 716 of 2025 2 Digitally signed by :- MANOJ VIKRAM SINGH CHAUHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench