Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 161573 (ALL)

BRAJMOHAN MISHRA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. KRISHI VIPRAN AND VIDESH VYAPAR LKO. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/9954/2025 · 2025-09-11

Abdul Moin

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 9954 of 2025 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for respondent no.1 and Sri Aditya Mohan, learned counsel, who files Vakalatnama on behalf of respondents no.2 and 3. 2. Instant petition has been filed praying for a mandamus commanding the respondent no.2 to re-fix the pay scale of the petitioner in accordance with the 5th and 6th Pay Commission including all admissible ACP related benefits and to consider the representation of the petitioner pending before respondent no.2. 3. A preliminary objection has been taken by Sri Aditya Mohan, learned counsel for respondents no.2 and 3, that the claim of the petitioner has already been rejected vide order dated 24.01.2025, a copy of which is Annexure-1 to the petition, which order has not been challenged by the petitioner. 4. Considering that the claim of the petitioner has already been rejected and no challenge has been raised to the same as such the writ petition is dismissed leaving it open to the petitioner to challenge the said order before appropriate Court in appropriate proceedings. September 11, 2025 A. Katiyar Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Akhilesh Pratap Singh, Kushagra Kanodia Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Surendra Kumar Singh (Abdul Moin,J.) Brajmohan Mishra .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Krishi Vipran And Videsh Vyapar Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KATIYAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench