SANJAY ANAND AND 23 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. BASIC EDUCATION LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIA/9964/2025 · 2025-09-02
Abdul Moin
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 161561 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 161561 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 9964 of 2025 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent no. 1, Sri Ran Vijay Singh, learned counsel appearing for the respondent no. 2, Sri Mohit Singh Rajput, Advocate holding brief of Sri Pradeep Tiwari, learned counsel for the respondents no. 3 and 4. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the instant writ petition is being finally decided. Instant writ petition has been filed praying for a mandamus commanding the respondents to grant selection grade from the date when the petitioners have completed ten years service as Assistant Teacher.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that with regard to the relief sought in the writ petition, the petitioner may be permitted to submit an individual representation before the respondent No.3 which may be
directed to be decided within a fixed time frame to which learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent no. 1, Sri Ran Vijay Singh, learned counsel appearing for the respondent no. 2, Sri Mohit Singh Rajput, Advocate holding brief of Sri Pradeep Tiwari, learned counsel for the respondents no. 3 and 4 have no objection. In view of the above, it is provided that in case the petitioners submit an individual representation within ten days from today before the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Praveen Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Sanjay Anand And 23 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Basic Education Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
respondent No.3 then the respondent No.3 shall endevour to decide the same by means of a reasoned and speaking order within a further period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order along with representation. With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed of. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the case. September 2, 2025 Pachhere/- WRIA No. 9964 of 2025 2 (Abdul Moin,J.) Digitally signed by :- SATYENDRA SINGH PACHHERE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench