Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010210422025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] FRIDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 4521/2025 Between: Shaik Parveen and Others ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S): 1 . DHEERA KANISHKA Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S):
1. BODAPATI VAMSI KRISHNA
2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following:
2 CRL.P. No.4521 OF 2025
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N I.A. Nos.1 and 2 OF 2025 IN/AND CRIMINAL PETITION No.4521 of 2025 COMMON ORDER:
1. This criminal petition, under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘B.N.S.S’) has been filed by the petitioners/ A.2, 3, 4 and 7, seeking quashment of the proceedings against them in C.C. No.528 of 2024 pending on the file of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Kamalapuram, YSR Kadapa District, for the alleged offences under Section 85 read with Section 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. 2. The petitioner filed I.A. No.1 of 2025 and the de facto complainant filed I.A.No.2 of 2025, duly enclosing a Joint Memo entered between the petitioners as well as de facto complainant. It is stated that at the intervention of elders on both sides, the petitioners and the de facto complainant have arrived at an understanding and the matter has been settled between them. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel representing for respondent No.2 (de facto-complainant) and learned Assistant Public Prosecutor representing respondent No.1/State are present. 3 CRL.P. No.4521 OF 2025
4. Today, when the matter is taken up, petitioners herein/Accused Nos. 2, 3, 4 and 7 and the 2nd respondent herein are present before this Court. They produced their respective Aadhar cards in proof of their identity. The learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for 2nd respondent have identified the parties in the open Court. 5. This Court has questioned 2nd respondent herein/de facto complainant with regard to compromise, and she categorically stated to that extent that she has voluntarily entered into compromise with the petitioners herein/ Accused Nos. 2, 3, 4 and 7. This Court is satisfied with the identification of the parties and voluntariness in arriving at the compromise. 6.
Since the parties entered into settlement and compromise, the Criminal Petition is allowed and therefore, the proceedings in C.C. No.528 of 2024 pending on the file of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Kamalapuram, YSR Kadapa District, against the petitioners herein/ Accused Nos. 2, 3, 4 and 7 is hereby quashed. 7. Accordingly, I.A.Nos.1 and 2 of 2025 and Criminal Petition No.4521 of 2025 are allowed. 8. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date:09.05.2025 BV