SUSHILA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME AND ANOTHER
A482/7273/2025 · 2025-09-02
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 161525 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 161525 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 7273 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and the material placed on record. 2. Instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C./ 528 B.N.S.S. has been filed with the following relief:-
"Wherefore, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble may kindly be pleased to quashed the impugned summoning order dated 22.09.2020 passed by Chief Judicial magistrate Balrampur, in criminal case No. WSCC/37/13/2020/1880/2020 (State Vs. Sushila and another) as well as charge sheet No. 01 dated 27.01.2020 arising out of crime No. 255/2018 under section 306 I.P.C registered at police station Utraula District Balrampur contained as Annexure No. 1 & 2 to this petition in the interest of justice. And further prayed that this Hon'ble court may kindly be pleased to stay the impugned summoning order dated 22.09.2020 passed by Chief Judicial magistrate Balrampur, in criminal case No. WSCC/37/13/2020/1880/2020 (State Vs. Sushila and another) as well as charge sheet No. 01 dated 27.01.2020 arising out of crime No. 255/2018 under section 306 I.P.C registered at police station Utraula District Balrampur contained as Annexure No. 1 & 2 to this petition in the interest of justice. And father prayed that this Hon'ble court may kindly be pleased to stay the further proceeding of criminal case No. WSCC/37/13/2020/1880/2020( State Vs. Sushila and another) arising out of crime No. 255/2018 under section 306 I.P.C registered at police station Utraula District Balrampur in the interest of justice."
3. After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the applicant submits that in the interest of justice, this Court may please to give liberty to the applicant to move bail application and the same may be decided within stipulated period of time as may be fixed by this Court. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Manoj Kumar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Sushila .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
4. Learned Counsel appearing for the State has no objection. 5. In view of the aforesaid, the applicant is given liberty to move a bail application and if such bail application is moved, the same shall be decided in expedition by learned trial court. 6. The application is disposed of accordingly. September 2, 2025 Mohd.
Sharif A482 No. 7273 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD SHARIF High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench