Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 161513 (ALL)

TARUN KUMAR AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. IRRIGATION AND WATER RESOURCES DEPTT. LKO. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/9929/2025 · 2025-09-02

Abdul Moin

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 9929 of 2025 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent no.1 and Sri Nishant Shukla, learned counsel, who files Vakalatnama on behalf of respondents no.2 and 3, which is taken on record. 2. With the consent of learned counsels for the parties, the writ petition is being decided finally. 3. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioners is that despite the petitioner being eligible for promotion to the post of Soil Conservation Officer/Technical Officer under the service rules their names have not been sent till date by the competent authority. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners after arguing at some length submits that with regard to the relief sought in the writ petition, the petitioners may be permitted to submit a fresh representation before respondent no.2 which may be directed to be decided within a time frame fixed by this Court to which learned counsels appearing for respondents have no objection. 5. In view of the above, it is provided that in case the petitioners submit individual representation within two weeks from today before respondent no.2 then respondent no.2 shall endevour to decide the same by means of a reasoned and speaking order within a further period of six weeks from Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shambhoo Sharan Lal Srivastava, Ashish Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Jogendra Nath Verma Tarun Kumar And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Irrigation And Water Resources Deptt. Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) the date of submission of the representation along with certified copy of this order. 6. With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed off. 7. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the case. September 2, 2025 A. Katiyar WRIA No. 9929 of 2025 2 (Abdul Moin,J.) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KATIYAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench