Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 161496 (ALL)

DINA NATH VERMA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

CRLP/8083/2025 · 2025-09-08

Rajeev Singh, Rajnish Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 8083 of 2025 Court No. - 10 HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J. HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J. Heard Sri Krishna Mohan Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Nikhil Singh, learned AGA. This petition has been filed with the following prayers:- "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the F.I.R. No.0223 of 2025, under Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), and 340(2) of the B.N.S.2023 dated 22.08.2025, registered at Police Station Dalmau, District Raebareli, as contained in Annexure No.1. (ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to not take any coercive action against the petitioner in connection with the said F.I.R. No.0223 of 2025, under Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), and 340(2) of the B.N.S.2023 dated 22.08.2025, registered at Police Station Dalmau, District Raebareli as contained in Annexure No.1." Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing at some length submits that the petition may be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to avail the remedy of anticipatory bail. To which there is no objection by learned AGA. In view of above, the petition is dismissed as not pressed with liberty as aforesaid. September 8, 2025 Akanksha Sri/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Krishna Mohan Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Rajeev Singh,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Dina Nath Verma .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AKANKSHA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench