Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16149 (UTT)

DILIP GEHLOT v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/276/2025 · 2025-10-16

Ashish Naithani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No. Dat e Office Not es, r epor t s, or der s or pr oceedin gs or dir ect ion s an d Regist r ar ’s or der w it h Sign at u r es COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS 2025:UHC:9354 WPCRL No.276 of 2025 Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J. There is no representation for the Petitioner. 2. Mr. N.S. Kanyal, learned AGA for the State. 3. No representation for the private respondent. 4. Learned State counsel submits that charge sheet has been submitted in the instant petition. 5. In view of the aforesaid development, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Ashish Naithani, J.) 16.10.2025 Arti ARTI SINGH Digitally signed by ARTI SINGH DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=487ed955e722ba65aab55409e686c12fb83a19325e8b66890fbee418e7b69c0d, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=26DC90E00D839E3E8714131F235087D2D87E133C57E7F4A7B2E734BE2521F982, cn=ARTI SINGH Date: 2025.10.27 10:18:36 +05'30'