Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 161487 (ALL)

RAM GOPAL SINGH AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF SOCIAL WELFARE LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/8551/2025 · 2025-09-04

Brij Raj Singh, Sangeeta Chandra

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 8551 of 2025 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE MRS. SANGEETA CHANDRA, J. HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the State Respondents. 2. This writ petition has been filed with the following main prayers:- "(i) Issue a writ of mandamus or a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the Opposite Party No. 2 to pass appropriate order for extension of lease related to respective shop to the petitioners till their lifetime allotted under the Sainik Kalyan Evam Punarvas Scheme within time bound manner as specified by this Hon'ble Court. (ii) Issue a writ of mandamus or a writ order or direction in the nature of restraining the opposite parties from making or creating any hindrance in peaceful possession and operation of shop in question in any manner till their lifetime." 3. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioners are former Army personnel who have retired on different dates after rendering unblemished services. The petitioner no.1 had fought three wars i.e. 1962, 1965 and 1971 for India for which the Sainik Kalyan Evam Punarvas Department had allotted land to the petitioners on which they had constructed their shops in Basti. The lease deed of 30 years was signed on behalf of Zila Sainik Kalyan & Punarvas Adhikar Basti, which Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Avnish Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Ram Gopal Singh And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Social Welfare Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) was extendable, but the respondent no.4 instead of extending the lease is misbehaving with the petitioner. The petitioners have made an application to the Director, Sainik Kalyan & Punarvas, Uttar Pradesh, Kariyappa Bhawan, Qisar Bagh, Lucknow, a copy of which has been filed as Annexure No.5 to the writ petition. The application/representation has not yet been decided, hence this writ petition has been filed. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of with a direction to the opposite party no.2 to look into the grievance of the petitioners and pass an appropriate reasoned and speaking order within a period of four weeks from the date a copy of this order is produced before him. September 4, 2025 Darpan Sharma WRIC No. 8551 of 2025 2 (Brij Raj Singh,J.) (Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J.) Digitally signed by :- DARPAN SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench