MRS DEEPA PRIYESH v. M/S G M INFINITE DWELLING (INDIA) PVT LTD
CRP/60/2021 · 2025-03-17
R Devdas
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16148 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16148 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC:10908 CRP No. 60 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 60 OF 2021 (IO) BETWEEN:
1.
MRS. DEEPA PRIYESH, W/O. PRIYESH SANKARAN, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, R/O No.30 JYOYUTHIRMAYA BLUEMOON GARDEN, NEAR VISHWABHARATHI PUBLIC SCHOOL, VIDYARANYAPURA, BANGALORE-97.
2.
MR. PRIYESH SANKARAN, S/O. T. V. SANKARAN, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/O. NO.30 JYOYUTHIRMAYA, BLUEMOON GARDEN, NEAR VISHWABHARATHI, PUBLIC SCHOOL, VIDYARANYAPURA, BANGALORE-97. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SHIVARAJ N. ARALI, ADVOCATE (ABSENT) ) AND:
1.
M/S. G. M. INFINITE DWELLING (INDIA) PVT. LTD., HAVING THEIR REG. OFFICE AT NO.6, GM PEARL, BTM Digitally signed by JUANITA THEJESWINI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC:10908 CRP No. 60 of 2021
2.
PHASE, BANGALORE-68.
REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.
MR. GULAM MUSTAFA, AGED MAJOR, NO.6 GM PEARL, BTM LAYOUT, 1ST STAGE, 1ST PHASE, BANGALORE-68.
3.
JAWID HUSSAIN (DIRECTOR) AGED MAJOR, NO.6, GM PEARL, BTM LAYOUT, 1ST STAGE, 1ST PHASE, BENGALURU - 68. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. RAMA R. IYER, ADVOCATE FOR R1;
R2 AND R3 SERVED-UNREPRESENTED)
THIS CRP FILED UNDER SEC.115 OF CPC., 1908 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 10.11.2020 PASSED ON IA.NO.5 IN OS.NO.8228/2018 ON THE FILE OF THE XIV ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL JUDGE, BENGALURU, ALLOWING THE IA.NO.5 FILED UNDER SEC.8 OF ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, 1996 R/W ORDER 7 RULE 11(d) OF CPC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC:10908 CRP No. 60 of 2021 ORAL ORDER
Matter is called out. There is no representation for the petitioners. On the previous occasion, learned counsel for the petitioners had stated that the prayer made in the CRP has become infructuous since the matter has been settled between the parties. Consequently, the CRP stands disposed of accordingly. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE DS CT:TSM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 29