RAJ KISHOR CHAUDHARY AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
NA528/14802/2025 · 2025-05-18
Sanjay Kumar Pachori
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16148 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16148 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:84074 Court No. - 72 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 14802 of 2025 Applicant :- Raj Kishor Chaudhary And 2 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Prashant Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J. Heard Sri Prashant Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the applicants and Sri Karunakar Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material on record. The present application under Section 528 BNSS has been filed to quash the entire proceedings of Criminal Case arising out of Case Crime No. 193 of 2022, under Sections 407, 420, 120B of I.P.C., Police Station- Nawabganj, District- Kanpur Nagar, as well as cognizance/ summoning order 30.09.2023 pending in the Court of A.C.J, (Senior Division), Court No. 5, Kanpur Nagar.
Learned counsel for the applicants submits that applicants were not arrested during the course of investigation and the charge- sheet have been submitted against them. It is further submitted that the offence is punishable up to 7 years imprisonment. Upon considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer made by learned counsel for the applicants is, hereby, refused. After some arguments, learned counsel for the applicants wants to withdraw the application with liberty to file a regular bail application before the court of competent jurisdiction. In case bail application is filed by the learned counsel for the applicants, the same shall be decided in the light of the observations made in the judgments rendered by the Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation & Another, (2022) 10 SCC 51, wherein the Supreme Court considering the category(A) as mentioned in the paragraph no. 2, bail applications of such accused against which charge-sheet has been submitted on appearance may be decided without the accused being taken in physical custody or by granting interim bail till the bail application is decided. It has been observed that at the cost of repetition, we wish to state
that, in category A, one would except a better exercise of discretion on the part of the court in favour of the accused. The application stands disposed of with the aforesaid liberty.
Order Date :- 19.5.2025 PS Digitally signed by :- POOJA SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- POOJA SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- POOJA SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad