Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 161477 (ALL)

JAI KISHAN JAKHODIA v. ASSISTANT RECORD OFFICER, AYODHYA AND 2 OTHERS

A227/5201/2025 · 2025-09-02

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5201 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard Sri Hari Om Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to private respondents is dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 1 - Assistant Record Officer, District - Ayodhya, to decide Case No. 11307 of 2023 (Computerized Case No. T 202304230111307) - Jai Kishan Jakhodia Vs. Mahant Baljeet Singh Sodhi, U/S 49 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 - Assistant Record Officer, District - Ayodhya, considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits of the case, respondent no. 1 - Assistant Record Officer, District - Ayodhya, is directed to decide Case No. 11307 of 2023 (Computerized Case No. T 202304230111307) - Jai Kishan Jakhodia Vs. Mahant Baljeet Singh Sodhi, U/S 49 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously, say within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. 8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. September 2, 2025 A. Verma Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Hari Om Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Alok Mathur,J.) Jai Kishan Jakhodia .....Petitioner(s) Assistant Record Officer, Ayodhya And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench