Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 161458 (ALL)

RAM PADARATH PAL v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE LKO. AND 7 OTHERS

WRIC/8486/2025 · 2025-09-09

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 8486 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard Ms. Zeneth Siddiqui learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel. 2. The present petition has been filed with the following prayer : (i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus to directing the opposite party no. 5 and 6 to compliance the direction given by opposite party no.4/ district Panchayti raj adhikari District pratapgarh which is contain in annexure no. 4 to the writ petition. (ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus to commanding and directing the opposite parties 1 to 7 remove the encroachment from the public path which is situated Ishanpur, Payagpur Aurehta Pratapgarh Uttar Pradesh from dulapur minor canal to Ram Ashrai house. 3. Standing Counsel, on the basis of the instructions, states that the offensive layer has been removed from the public path. 4. In view thereof, nothing survives. 5. The petition is consigned to records. September 9, 2025 VNP/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Devendra Kumar Pathak Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Ram Padarath Pal .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Lko. And 7 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VISHVANATH PRASAD SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench