HABEEBA KHAN AND 4 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. U.P. LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
CRLP/8078/2025 · 2025-09-08
Rajeev Singh, Rajnish Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 161452 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 161452 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 8078 of 2025 Court No. - 10 HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J.
HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J. Shri Aditya Vikram Singh, Advocate filed 'Vakalatnama' on behalf of opposite party no.3, which is taken on record. Heard, Shri Manish Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel for the petitioners learned A.G.A. and Shri Aditya Vikram Singh, learned counsel for opposite party no.3. This petition has been filed with the following prayers:-
"I) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned First Information Report (FIR) dated 11/05/2025 bearing no.-86/2025, U/s 127(2), 115(2), 352, 251(3), 324(2), 191(2) BNS, P.S.-Hasanganj, Lucknow, contained as ANNEXURE N.-1 to this writ petition. II) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite parties no.1 and 2 not to take coercive action against the petitioners and their family members pursuant to the impugned FIR. III) Any other relief deemed fit and proper may also kindly be passed in the favour of petitioners. (IV) Kindly allow the writ petition with costs."
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have settled their dispute, which is essentially civil in nature and entered into a compromise for quashing the impugned First Information Report, which has been annexed alongwith the petition at page nos.35 to 38. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Manish Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Habeeba Khan And 4 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. U.P. Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)
Learned counsel for the respondent no.3 does not dispute the contention of
learned counsel for the petitioners and submits that the parties have settled their dispute and the FIR may be quashed. Learned A.G.A., on the basis of instructions, submits that the charge sheet has been prepared on 28.05.2025 and the same is with Shri Lal Chandra Yadav, Sub Inspector, Police Station-Hasanganj, District-Lucknow. In view of above the petition is disposed of with the direction to the concerned Investigating Officer to consider the compromise entered into between the parties and forward the police report accordingly. The original compromise annexed with the petition shall be returned to the petitioners after keeping the photocopy of the same on record forthwith which shall be filed by the petitioners before the concerned Investigating Officer within a week. September 8, 2025 Banswar
CRLP No. 8078 of 2025 2 (Rajeev Singh,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAM NARESH BANSWAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench