SANDEEP SHUKLA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
A482/7297/2025 · 2025-09-04
Ajay Bhanot
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 161451 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 161451 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 7297 of 2025 Court No. - 15 HON'BLE AJAY BHANOT, J. Learned A.G.A. contends that from a perusal of the F.I.R, prima facie offence is disclosed against the applicant. The issue regarding the applicability of the relevant offences can also be argued at the stage of the framing of the charge. Sri Rakesh Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel for the applicant submits that he does not wish to press the relief sought in the instant application. The relief is accordingly declined. Learned counsel for the applicant recasts his relief. He submits that the applicant may be permitted to the trial court to move discharge application. It is always open to the applicant to avail his legal remedy as per law. The application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is disposed of.
September 4, 2025 Arvind Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rakesh K. Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Ajay Bhanot,J.) Sandeep Shukla .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- ARVIND KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench