Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 161442 (ALL)

PRAKASH CHANDRA SAXENA AND ANOTHER v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MAGISTRATE NAGAR,EAST,LUCKNOW DIST. MAGISTRATE DIST. SULTANPUR AND ANOTHER

A227/5269/2025 · 2025-09-04

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5269 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner. 2. The present petition has been filed with the following prayer : "Wherefore it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the learned court below i.e. Opp.party no.1 (Additional) District Magistrate (East)/ Rent Authority, Lucknow to decide the case no.759, Prakash Saxena & anr vs. Aneeta Srivastava expeditiously within the stipulated time as provided by this Hon'ble Court in the interest of justice." 3. Considering the prayer limited to the issue of mandamus, the writ petition is disposed off directing the opposite party no.1 to decide the aforesaid case/application expeditiously within a period of three months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order. September 4, 2025 VNP/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sanjay Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Prakash Chandra Saxena And Another .....Petitioner(s) Additional District Magistrate Nagar,East,Lucknow Dist. Magistrate Dist. Sultanpur And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VISHVANATH PRASAD SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench