Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 161436 (ALL)

GULAM MOHAMMAD v. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER ADMINISTRATION, AYODHYA MANDAL,,AYODHYA AND OTHERS

A227/5271/2025 · 2025-09-04

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5271 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents no. 1 and 2 and Shri Mohan Singh, learned counsel for the respondent no.3. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, notice to private respondents, is dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent no.1 to decide the Appeal No. 703/2016 (Mohammad Yunus and others Vs. Gulam Mohammad) under Section 331(3) of U.P. Z.A. & L.R. Act within any stipulated period as fixed by this Honb'le Court. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no.1 is desired to make all endeavor to decide the Appeal No. 703/2016 (Mohammad Yunus and others Vs. Gulam Mohammad) under Section 331(3) of U.P. Z.A. & L.R. Act, expeditiously, say within a period of six months from the date of Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shivam Srivastava, Ashish Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh Gulam Mohammad .....Petitioner(s) Additional Commissioner Administration, Ayodhya Mandal,,Ayodhya And Others .....Respondent(s) production of certified copy of this order, after affording opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. Counsel for the petitioner undertakes that he shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case, failing which the benefit of this order shall not be available to the petitioner. 8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. September 4, 2025 Muk A227 No. 5271 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHD UMAR KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench