Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 161429 (ALL)

VINOD KUMAR YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIA/10000/2025 · 2025-09-02

Manish Mathur

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 10000 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned state counsel for opposite parties. 2. Petition has been filed seeking a direction to the concerned authority to transfer the petitioner to his home district, Itawah, or any adjoining district, in view of paragraph five of the government order dated 6th May 2025 since the petitioner has less than two years to superannuate. 3. Since petitioner's grievances would require consideration of factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to make a fresh representation before opposite party No. 4 i.e. Commissioner of Police, Lucknow, U.P. or any other competent authority. In case such a representation is filed, the same is required to be decided within a period of three weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before the said authority. 4. The petition stands disposed of. September 2, 2025 prabhat Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Kapil Dev Chaubey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Vinod Kumar Yadav .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- PRABHAT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- PRABHAT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench