Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:18088 Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 24927 of 2018 Petitioner :- Rajni Kant Verma Respondent :- Additional Sessions Judge/F.T.C.Third Rae Bareli And Ors. Counsel for Petitioner :- Bireshwar Nath, Bireshwar Nath Counsel for Respondent :- Mohammad Aslam Khan Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J. 1. No one appears even in the revised call. Sri M.A. Khan is present for the respondents. 2. The present petition has been filed challenging the order of release passed in favour of the landlord as well as the dismissal of appeal preferred by the tenant. 3. From the perusal of two orders, it reveal that the appellate court had framed three points of determination, the first point with regard to relationship of landlord and tenant was decided in favour of the landlord, the second point with regard to the bonafide need was also held in favour of the landlord and the comparative hardship was also decided in favour of the landlord. 4. Considering the finding of fact recorded by both the courts below, no interference is warranted. 5. The writ petition lacks merit and is dismissed. Order Date :- 1.4.2025 VNP/- Digitally signed by :- VISHVANATH PRASAD SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench