Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 161426 (ALL)

UJJAL MURARI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME AND 2 OTHERS

ABAIL/978/2025 · 2025-09-11

Subhash Vidyarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 978 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Sri Alok Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Mohd. Asif Khan, learned A.G.A.-I for the State. 2.The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on anticipatory bail in Case Crime No. 0074 of 2024, under Sections 419, 420 I.P.C and 66-D of Information Technology Act, registered at Police Station- Cyber Crime Police Station, District- Lucknow. 3. After advancing submission at some length, the learned counsel for the applicant states that he does not want to press the instant application and seeks liberty to file an application for bail. 4. In view of the aforesaid request, the instant application is disposed of leaving it open to the applicant to file an application for grant of bail and in case, such an application is filed, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Satendra Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another: (2022) 10 SCC 51. September 11, 2025 Preeti. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Alok Kumar Srivastava, Jitendra Vikram Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Ujjal Murari .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home And 2 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- PREETI GAUTAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench