Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 161421 (ALL)

IRFAAN AND OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME. LKO. AND OTHERS

CRLP/8165/2025 · 2025-09-02

Rajeev Singh, Rajnish Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 8165 of 2025 Court No. - 10 HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J. HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J. 1. Heard Shri Dhananjai Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.G.A. appearing for the State. 2. This petition seeks issuance of direction in the nature of certiorari for quashing the impugned F.I.R. No. 206 of 2025 dated 09.07.2025, under Sections 110, 117(2), 126(2), 125(a), 352, 351(3), 115(2), 190, 191(2) B.N.S. and Section 7 of Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, Police Station Rupaidiha, District Bahraich. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the offences, as alleged in the F.I.R., have maximum punishment for the term less than seven years imprisonment, whereas the police is trying to arrest them, which is against the mandates of Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita.. 4. Learned A.G.A. appearing for respondents-State gives a statement on behalf of the Investigating Agency that because the offence, allegedly committed by the petitioners, entails sentence of less than seven years, provisions of Section 35(3) Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 shall be strictly followed in terms of judgments rendered by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the cases of Arnesh Kumar vs. State of Bihar and another, (2014) 8 SCC 273 and Satender Kumar Antil vs. CBI and another, Special Leave to Appeal (Criminal) No. 5191 of 2021 : (2022) 10 SCC 51. 5. Considering the stand of the Investigating Agency, learned counsel for Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dhananjai Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Irfaan And Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home. Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) the petitioners submits that this petition may be disposed of in view of the above said facts. 6. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of in view of the provisions of Section 35(3) Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and the law as laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the cases of Arnesh Kumar (supra) and Satender Kumar Antil (supra). 7. However, it is directed that the petitioners shall appear before the Investigating Officer of the concerned police station on 17.09.2025 at 11:00 AM sharp for the purpose to cooperate in the investigation. Thereafter, they shall continue to cooperate in the investigation till its completion, failing which, protection of this order may be withdrawn on the application being moved by the prosecution or the complainant. September 2, 2025 VKS CRLP No. 8165 of 2025 2 (Rajeev Singh,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- VIVEK KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench