HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 10034 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned State Counsel for opposite parties. 2. Petition has been filed seeking a direction to concerned authorities for considering period spent by petitioners prior to the regularization as qualifying period for payment of gratuity. 3. Since consideration of petitioners' grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioners to file a fresh individual representation before the opposite party no.2 i.e. Chief Town and Country Planer, Town and Country Planning Department, Lucknow who shall consider and decide the same within a period of eight weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before the said authority. 4. With aforesaid directions, petition stands disposed of. September 2, 2025 Satish Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ranvijay Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Mrityunjay Singh And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Housing And Urban Planning, Lucknow And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SATISH KUMAR BHARATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench