Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 161403 (ALL)

ASHA MISHRA AND ANOTHER v. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION U.P. LKO. AND 2 OTHERS

A227/5139/2025 · 2025-08-29

Jaspreet Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5139 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE JASPREET SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners. Notice on behalf of the respondents have been accepted by the office of the Chief Standing Counsel. By means of the instant petition, the petitioners seek expeditious disposal of the Appeal No.1979 of 2012 pending before the respondent No.1. Learned standing counsel submits that he has no objection in case an expedite order is passed. Considering the facts and circumstances, this Court is of the opinion that no gainful purpose will be served in keeping the aforesaid petition pending rather ends of justice can be served by directing the respondent No.1 to consider and finally decide the pending proceedings of Appeal no.1979 of 2012 as expeditiously as possible, affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties, but without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties. It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merits and the authority concerned shall be free to decide the matter strictly in accordance with law. With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of. August 29, 2025 Harshita Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Amit Jaiswal Counsel for Respondent(s) : Anupam Dwivedi (Jaspreet Singh,J.) Asha Mishra And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission U.P. Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- HARSHITA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench