- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:6333 WP No. 3511 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 3511 OF 2025 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: SMT NALANI W/O. LATE. RAJU. P, AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS, R/AT. NO. 172/2, 4TH MAIN ROAD, 4TH E CROSS, SRINIVASAPPA LAYOUT, CHIKKABANASWAI POST, BENGALURU-560 043. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. DEEPAK M., ADVOCATE) AND: THE BANGALORE CO OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER, HAVING IT'S REGISTERED O/AT. NO. 03, PAMPA MAHAKAVI ROAD, CHAMARAJAPET, BENGALURU-560 018. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI.K.V. LOKESH., ADVOCATE) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ANNX-C i.e., SALE NOTICE DTD. 11.12.2024 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT BANK UNDER THE SARFAESI ACT, 2002.GRANT AN AD-INTERIM ORDER TO STAY ALL FURTHER ACTIONS PURSUANT TO THE SALE NOTICE DTD. 11.12.2024 (ANNX-C) AND ETC. Digitally signed by KRISHNAPPA LAXMI YASHODA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:6333 WP No. 3511 of 2025 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER Learned Counsel for the respondent-Bank submits that the petitioner has already approached the Debts Recovery Tribunal in S.A.No.8/2025, questioning the impugned Sale Notice. Learned Counsel would therefore submit that the writ petition is not maintainable. The petitioner has not mentioned anything about the securitisation appeal filed before the Tribunal. 2. The objections raised by the learned Counsel for the respondent-Bank is upheld. 3. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE DL CT: JL