SADIK v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
A482/7225/2025 · 2025-09-10
Saurabh Lavania
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 161362 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 161362 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 7225 of 2025 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J. Heard learned Counsel for the applicant and Sri Nadeem Murtaza, learned Counsel for the side opposite. After arguing, at some length, learned counsel for the applicant submitted that he does not want to press this application and the same may be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to applicant to file appropriate application before the Court concerned based upon the evidence adduced before the trial court at appropriate stage. To the aforesaid prayer, there is no objection. Accordingly, the application is dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. Office is directed to return the certified copies of the documents , if any, to the learned counsel for the applicant, as per Rules in this regard. September 10, 2025 Jyoti/- Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Anurag Singh, Aditya Tiwari, Ashwani Kumar Singh, Dilip Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Akber Ahmad, Anjani Kumar Mishra, Gaurav Mehrotra, Nadeem Murtaza (Saurabh Lavania,J.) Sadik .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- JYOTI RAJWANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench