MURARI LAL BANJARA S/O AMARSINGH v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
HC/116/2025 · 2025-07-04
Avneesh Jhingan, Bhuwan Goyal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16135 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16135 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:24642-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Habeas Corpus Petition No. 116/2025 Murari Lal Banjara S/o Amarsingh, Aged About 41 Years, R/o Ward No. 18, Teeba Ka Mohalla, Chawni, Neemkathana, District Sikar (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Department Of Home, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.)
2. The Director General Of Police, Rajasthan, Jaipur (Raj.)
3. The Additional Director General Of Police, Anti Human Trafficking Unit, Jaipur (Raj.)
4. The Inspector General Of Police, Jaipur Range, Jaipur.
5. The Superintendent Of Police, District Sikar.
6. The Station House Officer, Police Station Neem Ka Thana, District Sikar. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Lokesh Kumar Verma on behalf of Mr. Amit Jindal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajesh Choudhary, GA-cum-AAG with Mr. Aman Kumar Ms. Sunita, CI Police Station Neem Ka Thana, District Sikar HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL
Order 04/07/2025
1. Learned Government Advocate-cum-Additional Advocate General has submitted the DNA report dated 03.07.2025. The same is taken on record.
2. The DNA of the deceased is matching with the wife of the petitioner.
[2025:RJ-JP:24642-DB] (2 of 2) [HC-116/2025]
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that last rites of the detenue were performed without informing the family.
4. In view of the above no further order is called for, the petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to avail remedy in accordance with law for redressal of surviving grievances.
(BHUWAN GOYAL),J (AVNEESH JHINGAN),J Sudeepak/32