Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 161348 (ALL)

RAJEEV PANDEY v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND OTHERS

CRLP/8185/2025 · 2025-09-16

Rajnish Kumar, Saurabh Lavania

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 8185 of 2025 Court No. - 10 HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J. HON'BLE SAURABH LAVANIA, J. Shri Gaurav Mehrotra, Advocate and Shri Nadeem Murtaza, Advocate have filed Vakalatnama on behalf of respondent No.4, which is taken on record. Learned A.G.A., on the basis of instructions, submits that during investigation Section 316 (5) of B.N.S., 2023 has been added. In view of the above, Shri Rakesh D. Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition may be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file afresh with proper pleadings and prayer, to which there is no objection by the other side. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed with the liberty as prayed for. September 16, 2025 ML/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Upendra Maurya, Rakesh Devi Prasad Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Saurabh Lavania,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Rajeev Pandey .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MUNNA LAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench