Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 161345 (ALL)

SIDDHARTH SHANKAR PANDEY v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. PANCHAYAT RAJ DEPTT. U.P. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/9904/2025 · 2025-09-10

Manish Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 9904 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties. 2. Present petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been filed challenging order dated 12.03.2025 whereby petitioner has been placed under suspension in contemplation of departmental enquiry. 3. Learned State Counsel has been provided written instructions dated 09.09.2025, as per which enquiry proceedings were instituted against petitioner and an enquiry report was also submitted whereafter by means of order dated 21.08.2025, re-enquiry has been directed. 4. In view thereof, learned counsel for petitioner seeks to withdraw this petition with liberty to file afresh to effect challenge to the order(s). 5. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn granting liberty to file afresh to effect challenge to order of suspension as well as order directing re-enquiry. September 10, 2025 kvg/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rishi Raj, Vinay Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Siddharth Shankar Pandey .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Panchayat Raj Deptt. U.P. Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- GIREESAN KV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench