Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16132 (CHH)

MOHAMMED AJHARUDHIN @ AJHAR v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRMP/1214/2025 · 2025-04-04

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:15830 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 1214 of 2025 Mohammed Ajharudhin @ Ajhar S/o Nijamudhin, R/o Sanjay Nagar, Madni Chowk, Salims House, P.S.- Tikrapara, Tehsil And District- Raipur (C.G.) ... Applicant(s) versus State Of Chhattisgarh Through- Police Station Mandir Hasaud, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ... Non-applicant(s) For Applicant(s) : None For Non-applicant(s) : Mr. Amit Verma, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice Order on Board 04.04.2025 1. This is an ofÏce reference. 2. This Court, vide order dated 24.11.2023 passed in MCRC No. 8070/2023, while rejecting the bail to the applicant, namely, Mohammed Ajharudhin @ Ajhar had expressed its trust that the trial Court would make an earnest endeavor to conclude the trial expeditiously in accordance with law, preferably within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of the order, if there was no legal KUNAL DEWANGAN Digitally signed by KUNAL DEWANGAN 2 impediment. 3. Earlier on two occasions also, this Court had granted extension of time for compliance of the order dated 24.11.2023. 4. The learned Special Judge (NDPS Act), Raipur District-Raipur (C.G.) vide its request letter dated 12.03.2025 has requests for grant of further two months time for concluding the trial. 5. It transpires from perusal of the PUD that in this case, the statements of all prosecution witnesses and defence witnesses have been recorded. The case has been listed for final hearing. Due to this, the trial is likely to take some time for its conclusion. 6. The request appears to be reasonable. The concerned trial Court is directed to conclude the trial as early as possible, preferably within a further period of two months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order, if there is no legal impediment. 7. Accordingly, this CRMP stands disposed off with the aforesaid direction. 8. Registry is directed to send a certified copy of this order be sent to the trial Court concerned for necessary information and compliance. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Kunal