DEVENDRA PRASAD MISHRA v. THE STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. OF REVENUE AND 4 OTHERS
WRIA/9897/2025 · 2025-09-01
Manish Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 161302 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 161302 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 9897 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite parties.
2. The present petition has been filed seeking a direction to concerned authority for payment of interest upon delayed payment of retiral benefits to petitioner.
3. Since consideration of petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, without entering into merits of the case, liberty is granted to petitioner to file a fresh representation before opposite party No.2 i.e. District Magistrate, Balrampur. In case such a representation is filed, the same shall be decided within period of six weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before the said authority.
4. With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. September 1, 2025 Subodh/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Bhanu Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Devendra Prasad Mishra .....Petitioner(s) The State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SUBODH KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench