Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16130 (UTT)

DHARAMPAL SATYAPAL LTD. v. GOVERNMENT OF UTTARAKHAND

WPMS/3019/2025 · 2025-11-11

Manoj Kumar Tiwari

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS W PMS 3 0 1 9 / 2 0 2 5 Hon ’ble Man oj Ku m ar Tiw ar i, J. Mr. Raj Kishor Choudhary, Mr. Rishabh Singh, Advocate and Ms. Ashwarya Sharma, Counsel for the applicant/ petitioner. Mr. G.S. Negi, Additional CSC, for the State. Mr. Manish Bisht, Advocate, i/ b Mr. Vipul Sharma, Advocate for the SIDCUL. (2) Prayer for extension is not seriously opposed by learned Counsel appearing for SIDCUL. Therefore, the time extension application (MCC/ 2/ 2026) is allowed. Time granted for filing declaration under Section 76(d) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is extended by ten days from today. ( Man oj Ku m ar Tiw ar i, J.) 1 3 .2 .2 0 2 6 Pr