Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 1613 (HP)

KUNDAN LAL v. STATE OF HP AND OTHERS

EX.P./2382/2025 · 2026-03-24

Jyotsna Rewal Dua

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Ex. Petition No. 2382 of 2025 Decided on: 24.03.2026 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Kundan Lal …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P and others .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Bonit Prakash, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, Additional Advocate General, for respondents No. 1 to 3. Mr. Tek Ram Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.4. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Pursuant to the order passed in this matter on 06.03.2026, learned Additional Advocate General has placed on record office instructions dated 19.03.2026 from the Director General of Police, Himachal Pradesh alongwith consideration order dated 10.03.2026. Further communication dated 17.03.2026 addressed by respondents No. 1 to 3 to respondent No.4 forwarding the revised pension case of the petitioner has already been placed on record. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the aforesaid office instructions and the documents appended therein though redressed the grievance of the petitioner, however, an appropriate call for releasing 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 pension in favour of the petitioner is yet to be taken by respondent No.4. 3. Learned counsel for respondent No.4 has assured that office letter dated 17.03.2026 shall be taken to its logical conclusion by the office of Accountant General (A & E), H.P. within three weeks from today. 4. Taking note of above submission, the present execution petition stands disposed of with liberty reserved to the petitioner to seek appropriate remedy for redressal of his grievance in accordance with law at an appropriate stage in case necessity so arises. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua March 24, 2026 Judge yogesh