Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16129 (PNJ)

RANJIT GILL v. ROSEY PATHAK

CR/7058/2017 · 2025-01-20

Nidhi Gupta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CR-7058-20 IN THE HIG 226 Ranjit Gill Rosey Patha CORAM: H Present: - NIDHI GUP against the j Authority, S order dated Nagar, Moh respondent petitioner. landlord sub 12.10.2017, condition an stayed subje of future re occupy the landlord sub 2017 (O&M) -1- HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HA Versus Pathak M: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH Mr. NC Kinra, Advocate for the Mr. Jag Nahar Singh, Advocate I GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The petitioner-tenant had filed t the judgment dated 20.09.2017, pas rity, SAS Nagar, Mohali, whereby w dated 31.01.2017, rendered by the le , Mohali, partly allowing the evi dent-landlord, dismissed the appea At the very outset, learned rd submits that a co-ordinate Bench o 2017, had issued notice of motion and direction that ‘dispossession ubject to his clearing all arrears of e rent by the 7th of each calendar the tenanted premises’. Learned rd submits that the petitioner-tenant h D HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-7058-2017 (O&M) Date of Decision: 20.01.2025 .… Petitioner .... Respondent NIDHI GUPTA for the petitioner. vocate for the respondent. filed the present revision petition 7, passed by the learned Appellate reby while affirming the order the the learned Rent Controller, SAS e eviction petition filed by the appeal the appeal filed by the rned counsel for the respondent- ench of this Court vide order dated otion in the present case on the ion of the petitioner shall remain rs of rent, if any, as also payment ndar month that he continues to rned counsel for the respondent- nant had failed to comply with the ition llate the SAS the the ated the in nt to the RISHU KATARIA 2025.01.22 19:00 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. CR-7058-20 said directio of rent, how month. Acco bearing COC of this Court landlord to in accordanc respondent bearing EXE vide order d Division), M over to the revision peti no contact w instant revi infructuous 20.01.2025 rishu 2017 (O&M) -2- irection, inasmuch as, although the pet t, however, he failed to pay future ren . Accordingly, the respondent-landlord g COCP-1314-2022, which was dispo Court vide order dated 12.07.2022, w rd to take out appropriate proceeding ordance with law to seek possession of Further, it is pointed out b dent-landlord that the respondent ha g EXE-76-2022, titled as ‘Rosey Pat rder dated 02.02.2024, passed by the on), Mohali, possession of the demis o the respondent-landlord. Thus, it i n petition has been rendered infructuo Learned counsel for the petition tact with his client/petitioner and has n Heard. In view of the facts and subm t revision petition is disposed of tuous. Pending application(s), if any, s 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable the petitioner had cleared the arrears ure rent by the 7th of each calendar ndlord had filed a contempt petition disposed of by a co-ordinate Bench 022, with liberty to the respondent- edings against the petitioner-tenant sion of the demised premises. out by learned counsel for the ent had filed a Execution Petition ey Pathak vs. Ranjit Gill’, wherein by the learned Civil Judge (Junior demised premises has been handed s, it is submitted that the present ructuous. etitioner-tenant submits that he has d has no instructions in the matter. d submissions as noted above, the ed of as having been rendered any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No ears ndar ition nch nant the ition rein nior ded sent has the ered RISHU KATARIA 2025.01.22 19:00 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.