( 2025:JHHC:22049 ) -1- A.B.A. No. 4117 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 4117 of 2025 1. Ainul Ansari, aged about 50 years, son of Husaini Ansari 2. Md. Chhutu Ansari @ Chhutu Ansari @ Md. Chhotu Ansari, aged about 49 years, son of Samruddin Ansari Both are residents of Village- Manjura, P.O. & P.S. Kasmar, District- Bokaro … Petitioners -Versus- The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ----- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI ----- For the Petitioners : Mrs. Pinki Kumari, Advocate For the State : Mr. Shree Prakash Jha, A.P.P. ----- 05/06.08.2025 The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Kasmar P.S. Case No.31 of 2022, corresponding to G.R. Case No.431 of 2022, registered for the alleged offence under Sections 302, 120B, 34 of the Indian Penal Code, pending in the Court of the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Bermo at Tenughat. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the allegations against the petitioners are that the petitioners in criminal conspiracy with the co- accused and in furtherance of common intention with them, have committed murder of Manoj Kumar. She further submits that the allegations against the petitioners are all false. She also submits that the allegation is that Manoj Kumar first assaulted the petitioners with an iron rod on their head by which, the petitioners sustained injury and thereafter, Aftab Ansari called the petitioners and Jahid Ansari and three assaulted the deceased, Manoj Kumar. She further submits that there is general and omnibus allegation of assault on Manoj Kumar by the petitioners. She submits that the father and mother of the deceased have not supported the case of prosecution rather they have categorically stated that they do not know how Manoj Kumar fell down in the ( 2025:JHHC:22049 ) -2- A.B.A. No. 4117 of 2025 well. She further submits that the petitioners are ready to co-operate with the investigation of the case. She also submits that the co-accused has been granted privilege of anticipatory bail by a Coordinate Bench of this Court in A.B.A. No.7938 of 2024, vide order dated 10.01.2025. On these grounds, she submits that the petitioners may kindly be enlarged on anticipatory bail. 3. Learned counsel for the State opposed the prayer and submits that the allegations are there. 4. Considering aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and further considering that co-accused has been granted anticipatory bail by a Coordinate Bench of this Court in A.B.A. No.7938 of 2024 and in the attending facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 5. Accordingly, the above-named petitioners are directed to surrender before the learned Court within three weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrender, they will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Bermo at Tenughat in connection with Kasmar P.S. Case No. 31 of 2022, corresponding to G.R. Case No.431 of 2022, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. 6. Accordingly, this application is disposed of. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Ajay/