Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16127 (UTT)

DINESH KUMAR v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPSS/2111/2025 · 2025-12-04

Alok Mahra

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPSS No. 2111 of 2025 Hon ’ble Alok Mah r a, J. Mr. Sachin Kumar Sharma, learned counsel (through V.C.) for the petitioner. 2. Mr. Dinesh Bankoti, learned Brief Holder for the State. 3. Mr. N.S. Pundir, learned counsel for respondent nos. 2 and 3. 4. In the present case, petitioner is a retired employee of Uttarakhand Transport Corporation. According to him, he was not paid benefit of 6th pay Commission w.e.f. 01.10.2006. By means of the present writ petition, petitioner has sought the following relief: - “Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondent nos. 2 and 3 to grant the petitioner the full benefits of the 6th Pay Commission effective from 01.01.2006, alongwith all arrears and applicable interest.” 5. Learned counsel for Uttarakhand Transport Corporation submits that if petitioner makes representation, the same shall be examined by the competent authority. 6. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of by permitting petitioner to make representation to Managing Director, Uttarakhand Transport Corporation, within three weeks. If petitioner makes such representation, decision thereupon shall be taken within four months from the date of receipt of such representation. ( Alok Mah r a J.) 04.12.2025 Ujjwal