- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:9018 WP No. 4593 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 4593 OF 2025 (LA-RES) BETWEEN: MUNIKRISHNAPPA, S/O LATE HANUMANTHARAYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/AT SAVAKANAHALLI VILLAGE, BIDLUR POST, KASABA HOBLI, DEVANAHALLI - 562 110, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. LOURDU MARIYAPPA A, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER AND COMPETENT AUTHORITY, NATIONAL HIGHWAY AUTHORITY OF INDIA, NH-207, [HOSAKOTE-DABBASPET SECTION] SITE OFFICE NELAMANGALA - 562 123. 2. N. MURTHY S/O NANJAPPA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, 3. KESHAV, S/O NANJAPPA, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, Digitally signed by KRISHNAPPA LAXMI YASHODA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:9018 WP No. 4593 of 2025 4. NANJEGOWDA, S/O HANUMANTHARAYAPPA AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS 5. SMT. RATHNAMMA W/O VENKATACHALAIAH AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS 6. SMT SHARADAMMA W/ O MUNIRAJU AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS RESPONDENTS NO. 2 TO 6 ARE RESIDING AT SAVAKANAHALLI VILLAGE, DEVANAHALLI TALUK - 562 110. 7. SMT. BHAVYA, W/O GOPAL, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, R/AT YARRAPPANAHALLI VILLAGE, DEVANAHALLI TALUK - 562 110. 8. SMT. BHAGYA, W/O LATE HANUMANTHRAYAPPA AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, RESIDING AT BYRASAMDRA VILLAGE, SIDDLAGHATA TALUK - 562 105. CHIKKABALLPURA DISTRICT. …RESPONDENTS THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASHING THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT PASSED BY THE HONBLE V ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, BENGALURU RURAL, SITTING AT DEVANAHALLI, DATED 30-09-2024, AT ANNEXURE-A PASSED IN MISCELLANEOUS NO-15017-2021, WHEREIN THE FIRST RESPONDENT HAS FILED THE PETITION UNDER SECTION 3- - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:9018 WP No. 4593 of 2025 H(4) OF NATIONAL HIGHWAYS ACT-1956 R/W SECTION 151 OF CPC, AGAINST THE PETITIONER AND OTHERS AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER Having regard to the office objection raised regarding the maintainability of the writ petition, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave of this Court to withdraw the writ petition and file the appeal in accordance with law. 2. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn while reserving liberty to the petitioner to prefer an appeal in accordance with law. If such an appeal is filed, the time spent by the petitioner before this Court in this writ petition shall be taken into consideration. 3. The certified copy of the impugned order, Annexure-A shall be returned to the petitioner while maintaining a copy for the record. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE rv Sl No.: 28, CT: BHK